+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: BATF on when 37mm Launchers become Destructive Devices

  1. #1
    Owner Edd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    14

    BATF on when 37mm Launchers become Destructive Devices

    [ATF Ruling 95-3]

    18 U.S.C. section 921(a)(4); DESTRUCTIVE DEVICE 26 U.S.C.
    section 5845(f)(2); DESTRUCTIVE DEVICE (Firearm having a bore of
    more than one-half inch in diameter)

    37/38 mm gas/flare guns possessed with cartridges containing
    wood pellets, rubber pellets or balls, or bean bags are classified
    as destructive devices for purposes of the Gun Control Act, 18
    U.S.C. Chapter 44, and the National Firearms Act, 26 U.S.C. Chapter
    53.

    ATF Ruling 95-3

    The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) has examined
    various 37/38 mm gas/flare guns in combination with certain types
    of ammunition to determine whether these are destructive devices as
    defined in the Gun Control Act (GCA), 18 U.S.C. Chapter 44, and the
    National Firearms Act (NFA), 26 U.S.C. Chapter 53.

    Section 5845(f), Title 26, United States Code, classifies
    certain weapons as "destructive devices" which are subject to the
    registration and tax provisions of the National Firearms Act (NFA).
    Section 5845(f)(2) provides as follows:

    (f) Destructive device. --The term "destructive device" means
    * * * (2) any type of weapon by whatever name known which will, or
    which may be readily converted to, expel a projectile by the action
    of an explosive or other propellant, the barrel or barrels of which
    have a bore of more than one-half inch in diameter, except a
    shotgun or shotgun shell which the Secretary or his delegate finds
    is generally recognized as particularly suitable for sporting
    purposes . . .'

    Section 5845(f)(3) excludes from the term "destructive device"
    any device which is neither designed or redesigned for use as a
    weapon and any device, although originally designed for use as a
    weapon, which is redesigned for use as a signaling, pyrotechnic,
    line throwing, safety, or similar device.

    The definition of "destructive device" in the GCA (18 U.S.C.
    section 921(a)(4)) is identical to that in the NFA.

    ATF has previously held that devices designed for expelling
    tear gas or pyrotechnic signals are not weapons and are exempt from
    the destructive device definition. However, ammunition designed to
    be used against individuals is available for these 37/38 mm
    devices. This "anti-personnel" ammunition consists of cartridges
    containing wood pellets, rubber pellets or balls, and bean bags.

    When a gas/flare gun is possessed with "anti-personnel" type
    ammunition, it clearly becomes an instrument of offensive or
    defensive combat and is capable of use as a weapon. Since these
    gas/flare guns have a bore diameter of greater than one-half inch,
    fire a projectile by the means of an explosive, and, when possessed
    with "anti-personnel" ammunition, are capable of use as weapons,
    the combination of the gas/flare gun and "anti-personnel"
    ammunition is a destructive device as defined in the GCA and NFA.
    As a result, registration as a destructive device is required. Any
    person possessing a gas/flare gun with which "anti-personnel"
    ammunition will be used must register the making of a destructive
    device prior to the acquisition of any "anti-personnel" ammunition.
    In addition, the gas/flare guns are classified as firearms as
    defined by the GCA when possessed with "anti-personnel" type
    ammunition.

    Each gas/flare gun possessed with anti-personnel ammunition
    will be required to be identified as required by law and
    regulations (27 C.F.R. section 178.92 and 179.102), including a
    serial number. Any person manufacturing the gas/flare gun and the
    "anti-personnel" ammunition must, if selling them in combination,
    have the appropriate Federal firearms license as a manufacturer of
    destructive devices and must have paid the special (occupational)
    tax as a manufacturer of National Firearms Act firearms. Any person
    importing the gas/flare gun and the "anti-personnel" ammunition
    must, if importing them in combination, have the appropriate
    Federal firearms license as an importer of destructive devices and
    must have paid the special (occupational) tax as an importer of
    National Firearms Act firearms.

    Further, the "anti-personnel" ammunition to be used in the
    gas/flare launchers is ammunition for destructive devices for
    purposes of the GCA. Any person manufacturing the "anti-personnel"
    ammunition must have the appropriate Federal firearms license as a
    manufacturer of ammunition for destructive devices. Any person
    importing the "anti-personnel" ammunition must have the appropriate
    Federal firearms license as an importer of ammunition for
    destructive devices.

    HELD: 37/38 mm gas/flare guns possessed with "anti-personnel"
    ammunition, consisting of cartridges containing wood pellets,
    rubber pellets or balls, or bean bags, are destructive devices as
    that term is used in 18 U.S.C. section 921(a)(4) and 26 U.S.C.
    section 5845(f)(2).
    "Victims? Don't be melodramatic. Look down there. Tell me. Would you really feel any pity if one of those dots stopped moving forever? If I offered you twenty thousand pounds for every dot that stopped, would you really, old man, tell me to keep my money, or would you calculate how many dots you could afford to spare? Free of income tax, old man. Free of income tax. -- Harry Lime

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    9

    Not surprising. I would expect the BATF to strictly construe the provisions of Section 5845 and the like so as not to grant anyone the benefit of the doubt. They're not likely to be laughing if you push the envelope to test the limits of the law.

    I think staying ahead of them would likely require not only a thorough knowledge of the relevant statutes and regulations, but also a healthy imagination that a lot of bureaucrats do not possess. Having a Tom Hagen around never hurts.

    DH

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts